關於實x補習班


建築相關國家考試、建築師考試準備、心得及經驗分享。

說說自己的看法

文章greatbevis » 2009 3月 26 (週四) 1:37 pm



贊助商連結

1.補習班不是罪大惡極

2.改革考試並非對所有人公平

3.依靠目前的大學教育可以提升道德與良知也是不切實際

4.離職考試多是為了有個建築師的身分,或可稍微提升收入罷了

5.AIA的考試也有"專業輔導機構"協助考生

以上供參

加入建築人討論區粉絲團
greatbevis
 
文章: 22
註冊時間: 2007 12月 18 (週二) 4:34 pm
來自: 高雄

文章風之笑笑 » 2009 3月 26 (週四) 3:41 pm

是不是一定要補習才能考上....................不一定.自己念也可考上.但要唸的正確.念的更廣更深
是不是學校學的加上工作經驗就會考上.....非常艱難.所以就算沒去補的.也必須依靠補習教材或是前人經驗
補習是不是有幫助.....當然有.考試是相對分數.8-9成考生都去補了.你至少要贏過這些人唸過的書

以上幾個條件雖非必然.但一定是9成上榜者的法則
有例外嗎?當然有!!!
想自我挑戰試試看嗎?
經過ㄧ成機會+七成努力+二成考運後
再以近年5-10%中的錄取率.以其中10%特例來算...(0.05~0.1)*0.1就是0.005~0.01的機會

結論與建議:
1.以前平均50分及格制.不用補習而考上的機會大於現在
2.現在分科60分及格制一定有些科目是你的弱點.想不補習除非你各科都能自己讀的好
風之笑笑
 
文章: 82
註冊時間: 2008 1月 02 (週三) 5:31 pm
來自: 台北

文章徐岩奇 » 2009 3月 26 (週四) 6:32 pm

應該進行民調, 選擇題出題的方向是不是對的
我問過很多今年的考生, 都說是的
以AIA為師是句簡單的口號, 題型, 錄取率等都該借鏡
對的, 就繼續堅持下去

很多人都持續努力中

...
徐岩奇
 
文章: 291
註冊時間: 2007 11月 19 (週一) 12:51 pm

文章Pedro Hsieh » 2009 3月 26 (週四) 6:50 pm

美國建築師考試的單位:National Council of Architectural Registration Boards Testing
ARE Overview
One of the important means by which NCARB member boards and Canadian provincial licensing associations fulfill their mission to safeguard the public health, safety, and welfare is the registration of architects. Every individual may apply for registration as an architect. To become registered, a person must demonstrate that he or she is qualified to render architectural services by meeting established education, training, and examination standards.

The Architect Registration Examination (ARE) examines candidates for their knowledge, skills, and ability to provide the various services required in the design and construction of buildings. The ARE is the only examination prepared by NCARB and has been adopted for use by all 55 member boards and the Canadian provinces as the registration examination required of all candidates for architectural registration.

No single examination can test for competency in all aspects of architecture, and the ARE is not designed for that purpose. The ARE concentrates on those services that most affect the public health, safety, and welfare. The ARE has been developed with specific concern for its fidelity to the practice of architecture; that is, its content relates as closely as practicable to the actual tasks an architect encounters in practice. In addition to testing for competence in specific subject areas, NCARB is aware of the responsibilities an architect may have for coordinating the activities of others involved in the design/construction process. This examination thus attempts to determine the candidate's qualifications not only to perform measurable tasks, but also to exercise the skills and judgment of a generalist working with numerous specialists. In short, the objective is to reflect the practice of architecture as an integrated whole.
qui seminant in lacrimis in exultatione metent
那含淚播種的人,必含笑獲享收成;
Pedro Hsieh
 
文章: 1203
註冊時間: 2007 11月 10 (週六) 10:23 pm
來自: 台灣中部草地

文章Pedro Hsieh » 2009 3月 26 (週四) 6:56 pm

美國建築師考試概況:

THE EXAM

How many divisions make up the ARE?
The ARE consists of nine divisions—six multiple-choice divisions and three graphic divisions. The multiple-choice divisions are: Pre-Design, General Structures, Lateral Forces, Mechanical & Electrical Systems, Building Design / Materials & Methods, and Construction Documents & Services. The graphic divisions are Site Planning, Building Planning, and Building Technology.

Who writes the ARE?
The exam is written by dozens of architects from NCARB’s member registration boards, consulting engineers and code officials. Canadian architects from the Committee of Canadian Architectural Councils (CCAC) representing the architectural associations of the 11 Canadian provinces also serve on exam-writing committees. Individual exam-writing committees for each division of the exam meet several times a year to revise and write questions and vignettes used in the exam.

Who decides what changes will take place in the exam?
Before any changes are made, NCARB's exam committees research the proposed changes and make recommendations to NCARB's Board of Directors. All changes to NCARB examinations are approved by the Board of Directors.
qui seminant in lacrimis in exultatione metent
那含淚播種的人,必含笑獲享收成;
Pedro Hsieh
 
文章: 1203
註冊時間: 2007 11月 10 (週六) 10:23 pm
來自: 台灣中部草地

文章archicwf » 2009 3月 26 (週四) 7:21 pm

徐岩奇 寫:應該進行民調, 選擇題出題的方向是不是對的
我問過很多今年的考生, 都說是的
以AIA為師是句簡單的口號, 題型, 錄取率等都該借鏡
對的, 就繼續堅持下去

很多人都持續努力中

...

老實說
小弟認為出題的方向是不是對的
除了當年考生
應該廣泛的涉及前幾年參與的考生(一年或兩年)
因為
簡單易得分的題目大家都會覺得是對的
也就是
不易得分的考試方向就會是錯的嗎?

更屌的話
找一些建築師來考
以那些建築師的分數來比對考生的分數
這樣~更容易看出來
頭像
archicwf
 
文章: 620
註冊時間: 2007 11月 21 (週三) 9:37 am

上一頁

回到 建築考試

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:Google [Bot] 和 2 位訪客